Videos Login Subscribe Renew E-edition
logo
ePaper
coogle_play
app_store
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Letters
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds
    • Place a Classified
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Legal Notices
    • Read Statewide Legal Notices
  • Archives
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
      • Columns
      • Letters
    • Obituaries
    • Classifieds
      • Place a Classified
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Legal Notices
      • Read Statewide Legal Notices
    • Archives
News
By Erin McIntyre erin@ouraynews.com on October 23, 2024
Commissioner: Complaint should be dropped
County argues it must investigate harassment allegations

A harassment complaint against Ouray County Commissioner Lynn Padgett has no merit and should be dropped, her attorney argued in a letter sent to Ouray County Attorney Leo Caselli last week.

Padgett’s attorney, Roger Sagal, offered her position on the complaint filed by Road and Bridge Superintendent Ty Barger in August, which he made public as ballots went out earlier this month. Barger detailed a series of events in which he said his department was targeted by Padgett in a “continued pattern of hostility” that he wanted to stop.

The complaint is being investigated by the Employers Council, which the county contracts with to handle workplace investigations. It’s not clear when that investigation will be completed.

Response to complaints

The first of Sagal’s arguments is that Barger doesn’t have a valid complaint.

“There are no allegations that Commissioner Padgett engaged in harassment or retaliation as defined in the Personnel Policy Manual. This should have been the end of the matter,” Sagal wrote. “There are no grounds that justify further investigation and the expenditure of county resources to conduct such an investigation. If you disagree, please identify the specific personnel policy that you believe is at issue based on the allegations contained in the complaint.”

In a response for the county, Caselli countered that unlawful harassment includes verbal conduct that has the purpose or effect of “substantially interfering with an individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment,” according to the county’s policies. He also wrote the county’s policy says it “will take affirmative action to protect employees from unlawful harassment,” and wrote complaints are not limited to protected classes, including age, disability and other situations.

A section of the county’s policies on complaints and grievances specifies, “Employees with complaints or grievances regarding working conditions, violations of policy, harassment, discrimination or other unwelcome intrusions into the work environment, may bring them to the attention of their supervisor.”

Barger detailed a series of incidents in his complaint, in which he accused Padgett of targeting himself and his department, and said he just wanted her behavior to stop so he could do his job.

“The complaint contains numerous allegations regarding working conditions, harassment, or ‘other unwelcome intrusions into the work environment,'” Caselli wrote.

Sagal also took issue with Barger’s characterization of Padgett creating a “hostile work environment,” saying none of his claims fit the definition.

Sagal also said Padgett disputes Barger’s claims that she pledged to support a petition to have him fired, or that she admitted to organizing a demonstration from the public at a meeting where his department was criticized for its response to a flood situation.

Even though Padgett may dispute these claims, it doesn’t mean the county isn’t obligated to investigate Barger’s complaint, Caselli wrote.

“The county is still bound to investigate an employee harassment complaint, even if the subject of that complaint may disagree with the merits of the allegation,” he wrote.

Concerns about going public

The letter to the county also raises concerns about the way the investigation into Barger’s complaint has been handled, and about Barger’s behavior — specifically that he made his complaint public. Sagal wrote that he had concerns that Barger’s release of the complaint damaged the public’s trust and the integrity of the investigation process, and raised concerns about others in the county being notified of the complaint before Padgett.

Sagal also claimed Barger making his own complaint public violated the county’s policy, and constituted disclosure of confidential information.

But this wasn’t something county administrators could control, Caselli wrote.

“I understand you are concerned the Complainant going public with the complaint undermines the integrity of the investigative process, despite the fact that you have also now provided a copy of your recent letter to the press,” Caselli wrote. “I want to assure you and Commissioner Padgett that the initial press disclosure of the complaint occurred on an individual, protected basis and the county manager and I did not encourage this.”

Email records obtained with an open records request show that Hunt contacted Employers Council on Oct. 1, asking to talk to an investigator. That investigator responded the next day, asking to verify the county’s membership in Employers Council and stating, “Ms. Hunt would like to speak with counsel as an employee has threatened to speak with the media about the subject of the investigation.”

Caselli said the county is bound by the Public Employee Protection Act, which requires employees to be protected from retaliation, including discipline or firing, if they exercise their rights to speak about workplace conditions or issues.

When asked why he wanted to make the complaint public this month, after filing it in August, Barger told the Plaindealer he wanted Padgett’s behavior to stop and he hoped making his complaint public would help. He also expressed frustration with how long the investigation process was taking – he filed the complaint on Aug. 29.

“I just want the behavior to stop,” Barger said. “And if it gets made public, people will pay more attention to what she’s saying, and she’ll be more careful and perhaps life will be easier for me and my department.”

Sagal questioned the timing of the complaint’s release, and raised concerns about the fact that Padgett wasn’t made aware of it until Oct. 7, after Barger told the county administrator he had given a copy to the Plaindealer. This was weeks after Padgett’s fellow commissioners were notified of the complaint.

“By his own admission the complaining party intentionally provided a copy of the complaint to the local newspaper before Commissioner Padgett was notified of the complaint by County administration and had an opportunity to respond within the proscribed process,” Sagal wrote. “The fact that the complaining party chose to disclose his complaint to the public before Commissioner Padgett could respond much less before it was formally resolved suggests that there may be other motives at issue here.”

Caselli wrote that while the county’s policy has a required timeline for initiating the investigation into a complaint, it doesn’t have a time requirement for notifying the person accused in the complaint. He said the Employers Council investigator “cautioned the County Manager against providing the Respondent with a copy of the official complaint or otherwise notifying the Respondent” and said the investigator would instead be responsible for contacting Padgett.

Other concerns

Sagal also raised concerns about a request from Hunt and Caselli for Padgett to only interact with the two of them at the same time to discuss county business while the harassment complaint investigation was pending, outside of public meetings.

“While Commissioner Padgett has attempted to comply, she is not bound by that instruction,” Sagal wrote. “She is free to communicate with any member of the county administration on any matter within the scope of her duties as commissioner without your presence being required.”

The county’s response indicates there are concerns about Padgett’s interactions with any employees who are involved in the complaint investigation.

“Going forward, the County Manager is now willing to have other administration employee(s) present for policy, budget, and/or operational meetings with Commissioner Padgett, aside from myself, if desired,” Caselli responded. “I do not need to be present for every meeting. However, given your letter, I would now also request that any discussions between Commissioner Padgett and individual County officials/employees, which involve the above-referenced harassment complaint, should instead be handled through legal counsel until further notice.”

Sagal also asked Caselli if he would recuse himself from the investigation.

“To the extent the investigation unnecessarily continues, please indicate whether you will recuse yourself from this matter given your position both as counsel to the BOCC and a witness in the investigation,” Sagal wrote.

Caselli said he would not be a witness in the investigation, and said he could not ethically participate in an interview with Employers Council because he has served as legal counsel to the county for several matters that are part of the investigation. But he said he would continue to represent the county.

It’s not clear what Padgett’s next steps will be if the county does not agree to cease the investigation into Barger’s complaint. Sagal did not respond to an email and phone call from the Plaindealer.

Get into the groove
Main, News...
Get into the groove
July 2, 2025
Carrie Ann Mund, left, dances with Tawnya Schiebel during the Mariachi de San Jose band’s performance in Ridgway’s Hartwell Park on June 29. The band performed as part of the fifth annual Fete de la M...
this is a test
Main, News...
Leaders object to public lands sale
Conservationists, ranchers, elected officials decry bill, though battle over federal property may return
By Lia Salvatierra lia@ouraynews.com 
July 2, 2025
Recent federal proposals to sell or develop Ouray County’s public lands would harm the county’s economy, identity and culture of ranching and public recreation, according to county officials and other...
this is a test
Main, News...
Sex assault trial moved to Montrose
By Mike Wiggins mike@ouraynews.com 
July 2, 2025
A judge has ordered the trial of a man accused of sexually assaulting a 17-year-old girl in 2023 to be moved from Ouray to Montrose. Seventh Judicial Chief District Judge Cory Jackson approved the tri...
this is a test
Celebrating the Fourth in Ouray? Load up on sunscreen, patience, courtesy
Feature
Celebrating the Fourth in Ouray? Load up on sunscreen, patience, courtesy
Private security to help with traffic, parking, so law enforcement can be more proactive
By Mike Wiggins mike@ouraynews.com 
July 2, 2025
The sights and sounds of the Fourth of July in Ouray are ubiquitous. The powerful spray of fire hoses. The shrieks of kids racing through Fellin Park. Cheers and honking horns on Main Street. This yea...
this is a test
News
New weapons policy would ban public, allow employees to conceal carry
By Lia Salvatierra lia@ouraynews.com 
July 2, 2025
County leaders are debating a new policy that would ban the public from carrying any weapons within Ouray County buildings but allow county employees with valid permits to conceal carry weapons in mos...
this is a test
News
County to debate Yankee Boy Basin restrictions
By Lia Salvatierra lia@ouraynews.com 
July 2, 2025
Ouray County officials will hold a work session to consider a resident's request to partially restrict motorized access in Yankee Boy Basin, which cited safety and environmental concerns. Resident Jen...
this is a test
ePaper
coogle_play
app_store
ePaper
coogle_play
app_store
Editor Picks
Meet your neighbor: Robert Stoufer
Feature
Meet your neighbor: Robert Stoufer
By By Chloe Kiparsky Plaindealer intern 
July 2, 2025
Name: Robert Stoufer Age: 73 Lives in: Ouray When did you come to Ouray? I studied to be a geologist, but I never did geology for a living. I went to college in Mississippi, and did grad school in Kan...
this is a test
News
Fire bans imposed throughout region
By Plaindealer Staff Report Plaindealer@ouraynews.com 
July 2, 2025
Several governments in the region adopted stage 1 fire restrictions this week, making it illegal to use personal fireworks, have any sort of open burning or lighting campfires outside permanent fire p...
this is a test
Letters, Opinion...
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Sign money could have been better spent
July 2, 2025
Dear Editor: We were out camping last weekend and received a call from a tenant in our Main Street commercial building. She was upset about the new sign that went up in front of our building. It block...
this is a test
Letters, Opinion...
Cuts harm forecasts
July 2, 2025
Dear Editor: I write in support of Karen Risch's column last week about staffing at the National Weather Service office in Grand Junction. Federal budget cuts have inhibited efforts to restaff the off...
this is a test
Letters, Opinion...
Congrats, Swiss Village
July 2, 2025
Dear Editor: Congratulations to the residents for your success at preserving Swiss Village Mobile Home Park! Your perseverance paid off. Thank you to Jay and Jackie, civic-minded people all along, who...
this is a test
Facebook

Remote-triggered avalanche in San Juan Mountains

First responders receive first COVID-19 vaccines

Ouray County Plaindealer
Office address:

195 S Lena St. Unit D
Ridgway, Colorado 81432
970-325-4412

Mailing address:
PO Box 529
Ridgway CO 81432

This site complies with ADA requirements

© 2023 Ouray County Plaindealer

  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Accessibility Policy